Posts Tagged ‘marketing investments’

Social media adoption: How will marketing spending patterns change?

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Although social media adoption rates are still relatively low—more and more companies are jumping in. And, as they do, we may see a dramatic shift in marketing spending patterns.

Today, most B2B companies are just dipping their toes in the social media waters. Some have launched blogs. Others are experimenting with Twitter. Still others are adopting a wait and see attitude.

Yet, if the conversation at a recent event hosted by the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council is any indication, most B2B marketers are ready to move forward. Right now, their biggest challenge is figuring out how to justify social media investments to skeptical management teams.

As I wrote in a recent article on using social media to accelerate sales, I believe the search for ROI is just a temporary hurdle. Early adopters are already beginning to address these questions. Moreover, many conventional marketing investments are difficult to measure—and there’s no reason to believe that it will be harder to measure their social media counterparts.

Social media represents a thin slice of marketing budgets

So far, social media has had relatively little impact on marketing spending patterns. In fact, everything I’ve read reports that companies are still spending most of their money on conventional marketing programs. Moreover, most of the money marketers are spending online is going to email newsletters, search engine marketing, or fulfillment of these and other direct marketing campaigns. Those B2B marketers that are launching social media campaigns are still experimenting–and most of the early adopters are just running pilot projects.

That’s changing very quickly though and the question in my mind is, “How will marketing spending patterns change as companies’ use of social media increases?” Here are some predictions.

Spending on content production will increase

Spending on content production will increase as word of mouth marketing moves online. Traditionally, word of mouth spread from person to person—usually one at a time. Most people only had conversations with those they knew and trusted—or those that these individuals introduced to them. Moreover, these conversations didn’t start until after the buyer identified a need.

Today, conversations start earlier. Rather than just contacting their colleagues for information, prospects turn to blogs to explore their options. That means that marketers who want to guide the conversation need to join the conversation earlier—either as a blogger or as a commenter on others’ blogs. Either way, they need to produce engaging content if they want to capture attention and shape prospects’ buying criteria. And, since there’s no barrier to publishing blogs, marketers often need to produce a lot of content to cover all their bases.

Once they identify a need, buyers usually turn to others for help with selection and to validate their impressions. In the past, these influencers included others at buyers’ companies, trusted advisors, and perhaps reference accounts proffered by Sales.

In the future, prospects may tap their social networks for customer reviews or to identify others who have had direct experience with the vendors they are considering. This means that marketers will need to maintain a presence in all the places where those that influence the buying decision congregate. They’ll need to create content to keep fans engaged—and address detractors’ concerns.

This spending will span all media

Today, most marketing communications are delivered in print. Now that it is no longer expensive or difficult to produce and deliver content in other media, more companies will deliver audiovisual communications online and audio communications via podcast.

Companies will bring content producers in-house

Due to the sheer volume of communications, companies will require full-time personnel to prepare engaging content for humans, optimize it for search engines, and measure its success. Rather than outsourcing creative and analytic functions to agencies, marketing departments will bring writers, graphic designers, and videographers in house.

Companies will allocate funds for social media platforms

Rather than re-inventing the wheel, companies will invest in browser-based solutions that will help them easily and cost-effectively develop, launch, test, and adjust social media campaigns. They will “rent” SaaS solutions rather than “buy” off packaged software to ensure they always have the latest technology.

Companies may reduce spending on public relations

Reporters are already trolling the web in search of news—rather than waiting for company press releases. If this trend continues, companies may reduce the money they spend on PR professionals to raise aware of their companies and solutions.

Small companies may increase spending on business intelligence

Today, few small companies invest in business intelligence on an ongoing basis—mostly because this information is not readily available. While they couldn’t afford in-depth marketing research, travel to customer sites, or even analyst reports, small companies may be able to justify lurking and listening to conversations among bloggers and within social networks.

What are your predictions?

If these predictions prove true, tomorrow’s marketing staffs will look very different–even though their goals and objectives will remain the same. Online marketing has already changed marketing spending patterns. Social media will also have an impact. Where do you think we’ll see these changes next—and how do you think they’ll impact the overall marketing budget—and the way companies structure their marketing organizations?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.com

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Shorten the sales cycle next year: Year end marketing planning

Monday, December 29th, 2008

What’s the financial impact of winning one more account per quarter? What would it take to do so? If you don’t know, now may be the time to find out so you can improve the top line next year.

Capitalize on success, avoid repeating mistakes

As the year ends, it can be helpful to take stock of what worked and what didn’t—so that you can capitalize on your successes and avoid repeating what turned out to be mistakes. Our clients find that one of the best ways to do this is to go straight to the horse’s mouth—the customers that bought and those that didn’t.

Make the most of your sales and marketing investments

Interestingly, despite the fact that many businesses invest a lot of time and money in getting new clients, relatively few have a structured process for going back to find out why they won when they won—and why they lost when they lost. Of those who do, many are surprised to find out that the reasons were not always what they suspected.

Forget your sales process, get into your buyer’s mind

As we’ve discussed in previous posts, your prospects’ buying process often starts months before your sales cycle. So step one is mapping their buying process so that you can later identify points where you could intervene more effectively to elevate your organization above the competition. For example, if you can find out what circumstances caused prospects to search for a solution in the first place, you may be able to source more buyers, just by looking for others in those same circumstances.

Nevertheless, the circumstances themselves may not be obvious. Although you may think that a prospect engaged one of your competitors to handle a recent acquisition, you may be surprised to learn that the prospect actually began sourcing a solution provider a year earlier when their own competitor launched a product that their own product line lacked. If that’s the case, then it may not be fruitful to focus on companies that have announced their attentions to acquire another company. Instead you may want to pursue companies whose competitors have recently made major announcements.

What do prospective buyers’ really care about?

When we perform win/loss analyses for our clients, we concentrate on buyers’ perceptions in four areas: the desirability of the solutions, the reputation of the vendor, the effectiveness of the communications, and the responsiveness of the individuals leading the sales or business development effort. In each case, our goal is to learn what factors were most important to the buyer and how our client’s company performed relative to the competition.

What really worked? What needs to change?

Rather than seeking to find out whether their performance was better or worse, we look for differences in our clients’, or the competition’s, performance that may have affected the outcome of the sale. Sometimes finding out why you won can be as, or more, useful than finding out why you lost. For example, the insights you gain may cause you to reinforce a particular marketing message. Or, they may drive you to reallocate your sales and marketing resources for greater impact.

Win or lose, relationships matter

So, as you’re closing the books on this year, ask yourselves whether you know for certain what to do differently next year. If not, it’s worth it to find out. Best case, next year will be more profitable. Worst case, the prospects in whom you’ve invested so much time will see how much you care about doing your best—and may be more likely to buy from you (again) next time!

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.com

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Developing a compelling value proposition: What you need to know

Sunday, December 7th, 2008

With the economy slowing, prospective buyers are scrutinizing every penny they spend. Therefore, it’s incumbent upon sellers to clearly articulate the value that prospective buyers will derive once they buy.

In recent posts, we’ve discussed the characteristics of a compelling value proposition, and the importance of concentrating your firepower on those companies that most value your capabilities. This week’s post discusses concrete steps you can take to identify, validate, and test your value propositions.

Begin by gaining deep insights into buyers’ needs and purchase preferences

As Steven Covey said, “Start with the end in mind”. To develop a compelling value proposition, you first need to validate what matters most to prospective buyers. Else, if you make inaccurate assumptions, you’ll miss the mark and potentially end up wasting lots of money on ineffective marketing programs.

This can be a lot harder than it seems because there are lots of important questions you need to answer first. Approach this assignment as journalists do when researching a breaking story. Start by inquiring about the 5 Ws and the H.

Who are your most promising prospects?

As we discussed in the past, the most promising prospects are those that value your solutions most and will therefore pay top dollar, buy more quickly, and/or motivate others to also buy. To find them, first list all the market segments that need your capabilities.

Then, eliminate less desirable segments. Examples include market segments that are too small to meet your revenue goals, are so competitive that they will drive up your cost of sales, and market segments that don’t especially value your organization’s unique strengths.

To rank the remaining segments, and identify your target market, interview key stakeholders in each. Key stakeholders include everyone that the decision maker involves in the buying decision–from external advisors to the internal personnel who will use and implement your solutions.

When will prospective buyers need your capabilities?

The need for many solutions is event-driven rather than ongoing. For example, companies are more likely to seek out insurers when they are contemplating taking on new risks, marketing agencies when they are launching new products, or a new accountant when they are dissatisfied with their current service provider.

Often knowing what events trigger demand for your solution can help you develop a more compelling value proposition. To find out ask about last time they purchased similar services: What caused you to purchase then—rather than six months sooner or six months later?

What do key stakeholders value most?

The only way to ascertain whether you solutions provide sufficient value to garner sales is to first find out what matters most to decision makers. Ask: What are their goals? How are they measured?

Then, ask the same questions of the remaining stakeholders. Although only one person can approve a purchase decision, others can block it if their needs are not met.

In fact, you may need multiple value propositions in order to win the company’s business. For example, the decision maker may be bent on achieving market share. Finance may require a certain return on investment. Supporting departments may care about the cost and ease of ongoing maintenance. Users may focus on ease of use and access.

Where do decision makers get their information?

Some decision makers learn of new solutions through trade journals or trade association meetings. Many expect those that work for them—and have subject matter expertise—to make them aware of the need for new solutions. Others turn to trusted advisors and colleagues for recommendations.

Where ever your decision makers turn for information, that’s where you need to place your marketing messages. Else, you run the risk that you will not even make the short list when it comes time to evaluate new solutions.

How do stakeholders decide whether or not to recommend your solutions?

Not only do different stakeholders have different goals, they often require different evidence to reassure them that your solutions will meet their goals. They seek this information to address their reservations and mitigate risk.

Some will require media coverage in marquee publications, others will require references and/or testimonials from industry leaders, and still others will require demos or tools that will help them calculate the return on investment they can anticipate. Again, whatever their preferences, you need to do it their way. Else, they may never access your value propositions—and you may lose the deal to the competition.

Developing a value proposition is an iterative process

Once you’ve identified a few value propositions, do some testing. Send out a direct mail piece and see how many people respond. Develop google ad word campaigns that offer a free demo. Offer a free webinar and see how many people attend.

If people show interest you’ve probably discovered something of value. If people invest time in learning more, you may have a compelling value proposition. If not, you need to go back to the drawing board.

Validating your value proposition helps you make the most of your marketing investments

Remember, it’s not what you think that’s important; it’s what matters most to your most promising prospects. That’s why industry leaders always invest in marketing research despite the fact that they have ongoing experience with existing customers.

With the marketing investments they’ve made in product development—and plan to make in promotion–large companies know they can’t afford to miss the mark. Chances are neither can you.

What surprising information has your organization learned when validating your value propositions?

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.com

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post